“Everybody Active Everyday” was published on the 23rd of October 2014 has been built upon from previous frameworks and initiatives to get everybody active (GOV UK, 2014)   The busy year saw four policies being published in response to the World Health Organisation’s (WHO) recommendations (2010.)

The Uk was able to model successful policies implemented in Finland, New Zealand, and Brazil, who moved away from promoting sport in favour of activity and well-being (Heath et al., 2012). Finland being the only country to make it law for people to have active healthy places to work, infrastructure into cycle lanes and activity promoted as medicine via healthcare workers, and increased opportunities to be active was very successful (Vuori et al., 2004).

The WHO stated that regular physical activity can prevent noncommunicable diseases and improve mental health in their global action plan on PA and health (Alwan et al., 2010: Matta et al., 2021).  The UK Government recognised that sedentary behaviour within children significantly increases the risks of developing non-communicable diseases in adult life (Hall et al., 2021: Poulton et al., 2002), older adults are at risk of slips and falls and poor QOL when Aerobic, strength and conditioning fitness is not maintained (Arnold et al., 2008: Taylor, 2014: Aburto et al., 2021: Islam et al., 2021) and much work is needed to support and create opportunities for underrepresented and minority groups known to be at greater risk of poor health for  a variety of biopsychosocial and discrimination factors (Karlsen & Nazroo, 2002: Martin et al., 2000: Wagner & Brath, 2012: Ding, et al., 2016).  

This resulted in the development of global and national physical activity guidelines. The key message was that at least 150 min of moderate intensity or 75min of vigorous exercise and two sessions of resistance training per week is required as a minimum amount to maintain good health (Sparling, 2015).

Key players were PHE’s entrepreneurs Jane Elison MP, Duncan Selbie, Lord Coe, and Jennie Price from Sport England launched round two of the Get Healthy Get Active 5 million project as part of the 'Everybody Active, Every Day' campaign Piggin, 2015).

PHE released many documents such as “Choosing Activity: a physical activity action plan” (DOH, 2005), policy makers recognised that transportation and environmental infrastructure were needed to encourage use of our public spaces and rural areas by making them more accessible and appealing (NICE, 2006). The ‘Be active, Be Healthy’ project joined forces with the Forest commission to encourage the public to utilise green spaces for PA. The marketing research highlighted the natural environment as a place to go to reduce stress, rejuvenate and revive (Lawrence et al., 2009). In 2003, the “Active England Programme” with funding from Lottery and Sport England totalling £94.8 million (Sport England, 2009). 67,000 participated in projects, with 25,000 of them classified as inactive. (Morris & O’Brien, 2011). The targeted groups for woodland projects were ethnic minorities, Women and girls, people with disabilities, over 45’s and under 16’s and people on low incomes, all of which increased in visits significantly (O'Brien, 2005).  An array of benefits were cited such as mental health, socialising and health, barriers to PA were many, notably, women expressed the guided walks and activities helped to overcome fears of safety and getting lost in nature (Morris & O’Brien, 2011: Marmot, 2013).

Multiple Streams

Multiple streams theory (Kingdon, 1984) states there must be three streams. The first stream is the problem that inactivity leads to health conditions, costing the UK economy 7.5 billion annually (OHID, 2019) it is linked to anti-social behaviours and adds to environmental issues, social isolation and mental health issues (Mukherjee & Howlett, 2015).

Historically (before 2002) policy problem brokers and actors framed the issue as populations not meeting the guidelines. The hidden participants within the policy stream process collated the flurry of epidemiological studies linking inactivity to economical loss, to rally up lobbyists and advocates working in several areas which are classed within the stream, but may not be there working simultaneously, who are needed to creativity solve multifaceted, ambiguous issues from multiple angles (Giles-Corti et al., 2015; Herweg et al., 2018; De Wals et l., 2019).

The second stream looks at what has been done before, evaluations on what did and didn’t work, this is known as the softening process (Cairney & Jones, 2016). The goal to increase activity, cost around £480 million, between 2012 - 2014, the “movement is medicine” drive saw ‘moving professionals” being born (PHE. 2017) The upstream programme trained G. P’s and healthcare professionals (HPC’s) to integrate PA advice during clinical practice (Brannan et al., 2019). Evaluation figures stated 79% of HCPs said they would recommend the PACAP to other primary HCPs (Copeland, et al., 2020). NICE and the DOH declared it excellent value for money (Weiler & Stamatakis, 2010; Hellénius & Sundberg, 2011). However, during the pilot scheme, the report highlighted many areas for improvements such as being used less frequently overtime (Copeland et al., 2020).

The Olympic Games in 2012 allowed lobbyists and advocates a window of time (critical for policy coupling amongst interest groups) where there was little competition for attention; to utilise the pride and tone of the country to push sport and physical activity into the public’s awareness and up the political agenda (Piggin and Hart, 2017) The APCPA lobbyist website was set up in response to the “Designed to move” report to rally support to end the PA inactivity epidemic in the Uk (Phillpots, 2013; Beacom, & Brittain, 2016). Key players gathered support for this were Sport England and Nike (Biddle et al., (2004).

However, it was found that those who were not invested in the Olympics were unaffected by the enthusiasm felt, and that those communities were the least likely to achieve the recommended exercise expenditure (Weed et al., 2012). The Olympic games bided for under the Labour Government, occurred at a chaotic time, when the coalition-  Lib Dems and the Tory’ Government were put together (Thornley, 2012). The proposed legacy was idealistic in its strategy to change PA by merely being inspired (Weed, 2012). The LTUK group set up were criticised by Government for not producing a specific, measurable action plan.  Finally, the DCMS’ came up with “Before, During and After - making the most of the London 2012 Games”. A move to increase sport participation in children within schools. As well as Inspire projects led by inspirational community members (Bloyce & Lovett, 2012).  It was clear the new Government were keen to mobilise partnership working across the Nations volunteers, stakeholders, businesses, and leaders to achieve goals to get everybody active (Kiernan & Porter, 2014).

Through evaluation of expected uptake of sport after the Olympics, It was clear that much more needed to be done around social inequalities and opportunities, language barriers, changing social norms and promoting safe exercise within the 15 million people living with LTC’s in England (Crisp, 2021). Although The Olympic games raised the frequency of those who were active, it didn’t significantly change PA levels long term, it did however highlight the disparities between socio demographic groups and PA levels (Minnaert, 2012).

The “Designed To Move” fronted by Nike, the International Committee of Sport Pedagogy (ICSSPE), NCSEM and others in 2012, put out its report with emphasis on increasing activity in under 10 year olds in schools, creating opportunities and making movement fun (Antala & Luptáková, 2018), a lobbyist document designed to apply pressure on Governments to implement PA policy (Piggin, 2015: Walker & Hills, 2017). For children, funds went towards the “change4life” sports clubs which were managed by the Youth Sport’s Trust to increase participation in activity and health lifestyles. An evaluation looking at data from 2013-2015 showed the Clubs had a significant, positive impact on the activity levels and wellbeing of 7,500 children who were attending more than 500 clubs (Foad et al., 2016). Critiques of the Change4life neolibertarian Government approach (against policy) suggests that the campaign delivers a strong message that healthy children are from white middleclass families, who have an authoritarian approach to parenting, ensuring they eat healthy foods, are given little choice and have a clear expectation of attending sports clubs daily, and that minority groups, and families in social deprivation should follow the model, implying that a lack of finances and insufficient upstream Government policies on food companies and infrastructure is not the problem, but a personal choice that needs education; thus causing shame and further social discrimination to families who require equity to access healthcare, activity clubs and diverse affordable foods (Leonard, 2008: Leonard et al., 2020: Mulderrig, 2017: Mulderrig, 2018: Evans et al., 2011).

Stake Holders

The third stream considers existing legislation, non-Government pressure groups and activists applying pressure and raising awareness of inequalities such as “Closing the race gap”, equality and diversity a high priority since the murder of George Floyd (Harper et al., Blackman, 2013).  Researchers found that racism is still prevalent within sporting communities and for underrepresented minority groups access to sport is still poor (Poulton, 2020). Targeted funding to these groups is required to help close the gap and to stay on track to get “Everybody Active, Every Day”. The Commission for Racial Equality (1995) has been promoting race equality with the public sector, stating that policy makers in the UK are slow to act and have struggled with the concept of equity since the early 1970s commitment to "sport for all." (Gov.UK March 2021). Research has highlighted that racism is not only the portrayed football fans displaying racism, but coaches, and club officials.  In 2003, it was still evident that most people in powerful positions in sport are white (Long Robinson & Spracklen, 2005). Achieving Racial Equality: A Standard for Sport (Commission for Racial Equality, 2000) was released in December 2000, establishing a framework of best racial equality practise for governing bodies and key sports organisations. This changed the policy direction (Equals, 2000).

More recently SE have issued a 10-year strategy “Uniting the Movement” targeting people living with LTC’s has been initiated to close the inequality gap for the 15 million people living with LTC’s (PHE 2021). The strategy to dispel myths that exercise is not safe, promoting the benefits far outweigh the risks as well as everyone has their own starting point to encourage small steps towards physical activity for all (SE report 2018).  Much work is to be done to educate community services to make services inclusive to all (Quirk & Haake 2021). The Richman Group were commissioned to do research into the barriers to activity, which were practical and logistical (Coulter et al., 2013).

The We Are Undefeatable campaign – The initiative - led by a collaboration of 15 leading health and social care charities and supported by PHE and SE- is intended to inspire and motivate people living with LTC’s to get active in a way that is appropriate for them (Morrison, 2020).

Designed from qualitative research into the lived experiences of people living with LTC's, who are doing little or no exercise, who informed academics of their perceived barriers to engage. Evidenced based Behaviour change (BC) science research guided the Government with Nudge tactics (Thaler & Sunstein, 2008); a neolibertarian approach, at a meso-level which lays responsibility on the individual for their health choices (Kohl et al., 2012) rather  than upstream expensive macro interventions such as safe green spaces and city design which promotes safe cycle routes to encourage PA (O. Ferdinand et al., 2012).  The 1990’s saw a surge of research into human behaviour through environment and PA, filling Socioecological frameworks and giving importance and awareness of factors within health. The relationship between environment, transport, occupation and leisure opportunities and PA has remained high on the agenda within PH (Khol., 2012). Research into BC has recently been led by Michie et al., (2014) who collected a framework of evidenced based BC theories and created a map for practitioners to use alongside the Transtheoretical model (TDF) which proposes the constructs to determine human behaviours based on the theory that every individual first needs the opportunity, ability, and motivation to access PA (another meso-level approach (Porcheret et al., 2014). The 15 years of research and evidence has shown the multitude of environmental and social interventions needed at many levels of society (Coalter, 2007).Nike who co-ordinated the business support of  The “Designed To Move”  campaign funded a paper to look at human behaviour “A human Capitalism Model” asking Policy makers to move away from framing PA as a purely physical need to eradicate non-communicable diseases, but to view it more broadly as different forms of ‘capital’ - physical, emotional, social, individual, intellectual, financial - resources that can be built on and drawn on throughout life” (Bailey et al., 2015), Academics criticised allowing companies like Nike and Coca-Cola who’s aim is to make profit above all else to write research papers for academic Journals, as well as using a model which depicts financial attainment as the most desired goal and pointing out people’s possible lack of capital, in an unfair society (Piggin, 2015).

Conclusion

Had there been clearly defined preferences and beliefs then the rational choice, or advocacy coalition (Sabatier and Jenkins-Smith, 1993) would be chosen. Rational choice is done at a bureaucratic level such as deciding funding, advocacy coalition works best at a group level with a group of actors with the same goals (Zahariadis, 1998).  Multiple streams allows many actors, levels of subsystems, and relies on windows of opportunities, community participation in communication demonstrated by the mass hash tagging of campaigns to drive awareness, and allows for crisis feedback on the large bank of economical, societal and health related problems correlated to inactivity Kingdon (Herweg et al., 2018).

 PA policy making is notoriously complex, rarely linear, and often ambiguous, a suitable fit for multiple streams theory (Cairney, 2016).  PA much like environmental climate issues, is intertwined into every aspect of our culture. If we do not live active lives the evidence is clear that we risk of poor health, putting pressure on all services and our living conditions (World Health Organization, 2019: Allender et al., 2007). however, it could be said that the problem has become so large, ambiguous, and made significantly worse by the UK government's Big Society vision which has sparked heated debate and controversy, particularly when paired with harsh austerity measures as well as the vast number of frameworks, campaigns and initiatives leaving the public feeling overwhelmed and confused (Norman, 2010: Piggin and hart, 2017: Stuckler et al., 2017). The level of deprivation, multimorbidity’s, of which one is usually a mental health issue and homelessness is increasing to levels which are causing the NHS and Social Care systems into chaos and severe debt (Mattheys, 2015: Humphries, 2022).  Recent reports from a survey of over 500 sported members showed that inflation rises has led many parents to consider stopping sporting clubs for their children (BBC, 2022), and Uk active have warned on BBC news that many leisure centres will close causing further harm to the public’s health (UKactive, 2022). The Journal of Public Health highlighted the inappropriateness of Mc Donald’s and Pepsi sponsorship of England’s Football Association, this was echoed by Colin and Mackenzie (2006) who also condemned the behaviour stating it as “highly inappropriate” and the “Vectors of Disease”. However Social norms has shown to be a big driver in human behaviour (Bauman et al., 2012), the level of awareness through leaflets, advertisement through social media, T.V as well has Health and Social care advocates for exercise has risen exponentially to levels which can no longer be ignored (Diez Roux & Mair, 2010: Bull et al., 2020: Carty et al., 2021). Sport participation has been stagnant or declining since 1990, while an additional 10% of the population has become physically active in ways other than sport since 1997. (Chau, et al., 2008: (Weed, 2017). A recent evaluation post COVID 27.5% of adults showed that adults did less than the recommended guidelines, one million more than the year before. There was a 50% drop in gym and leisure centre use from 2019 – 2022. Walking figures were the only increase from 3.6m more people walking than in 2019. This is a call to move away from putting onus on the individual to create community support for people experiencing social inequalities, disabilities and health conditions who have the lowest activity expenditure. supporting these groups may support targets to get everybody active everyday (Sport England, 2021).

 

References

 

(Ampproject. 2022) Cost of living crisis: Young will miss out on sport, community groups warn - BBC Sport (ampproject.org)

A review of the effectiveness of (nice.org.uk)

Aburto, J. M., Kashyap, R., Schöley, J., Angus, C., Ermisch, J., Mills, M. C., & Dowd, J. B. (2021). Estimating the burden of the COVID-19 pandemic on mortality, life expectancy and lifespan inequality in England and Wales: a population-level analysis. J Epidemiol Community Health75(8), 735-740.

Alexander, A. C., & Ward, K. D. (2018). Understanding Postdisaster Substance Use and Psychological Distress Using Concepts from the Self-Medication Hypothesis and Social Cognitive Theory. Journal of psychoactive drugs50(2), 177.

Alharbi, M., Gallagher, R., Neubeck, L., Bauman, A., Prebill, G., Kirkness, A., & Randall, S. (2017). Exercise barriers and the relationship to self-efficacy for exercise over 12 months of a lifestyle-change program for people with heart disease and/or diabetes. European Journal of Cardiovascular Nursing16(4), 309-317.

Allender, S., Foster, C., Scarborough, P., & Rayner, M. (2007). The burden of physical activity-related ill health in the UK. Journal of Epidemiology & Community Health61(4), 344-348.

Allison, R., Bird, E. L., & McClean, S. (2017). Is team sport the key to getting everybody active, every day? A systematic review of physical activity interventions aimed at increasing girls' participation in team sport. AIMS public health4(2), 202.

Antala, B., & Luptáková, G. (2018). International committee of sport pedagogy and its contribution to the development of physical education, physical activities and sport in the world and building related policies. Fizičko vaspitanje i sport kroz vekove5(1), 5-12.

Arnold, C. M., Sran, M. M., & Harrison, E. L. (2008). Exercise for fall risk reduction in community-dwelling older adults: a systematic review. Physiotherapy Canada60(4), 358-372.

Bailey, R., Cope, E., & Parnell, D. (2015). Realising the benefits of sports and physical activity: the human capital model. Retos: Nuevas Perspectivas de Educación Física, Deporte y Recreación, (28), 147-154.

Bauman, A. E., Reis, R. S., Sallis, J. F., Wells, J. C., Loos, R. J., Martin, B. W., & Lancet Physical Activity Series Working Group. (2012). Correlates of physical activity: why are some people physically active and others not?. The lancet380(9838), 258-271.

BBC. Sport. (2022). Cost of living crisis: Young will miss out on sport, community groups warn - BBC Sport (ampproject.org)

Beacom, A., & Brittain, I. (2016). Public diplomacy and the International Paralympic Committee: Reconciling the roles of disability advocate and sports regulator. Diplomacy & Statecraft27(2), 273-294.

Bhatnagar, P., Wickramasinghe, K., Williams, J., Rayner, M., & Townsend, N. (2015). The epidemiology of cardiovascular disease in the UK 2014. Heart101(15), 1182-1189.

Bloyce, D., & Lovett, E. (2012). Planning for the London 2012 Olympic and Paralympic legacy: A figurational analysis. International journal of sport policy and politics4(3), 361-377.

Blüher, M. (2019). Obesity: global epidemiology and pathogenesis. Nature Reviews Endocrinology15(5), 288-298.

Bornstein, D. B., Pate, R. R., & Pratt, M. (2009). A review of the national physical activity plans of six countries. Journal of Physical Activity and Health6(s2), S245-S264.

Brannan, M., Bernardotto, M., Clarke, N., & Varney, J. (2019). Moving healthcare professionals–a whole system approach to embed physical activity in clinical practice. BMC medical education19(1), 1-7.

Bull, F. C., Al-Ansari, S. S., Biddle, S., Borodulin, K., Buman, M. P., Cardon, G., ... & Willumsen, J. F. (2020). World Health Organization 2020 guidelines on physical activity and sedentary behaviour. British journal of sports medicine54(24), 1451-1462.

Bull, F., Milton, K., Kahlmeier, S., Arlotti, A., Juričan, A. B., Belander, O., ... & Vlasveld, A. (2015). Turning the tide: national policy approaches to increasing physical activity in seven European countries. British journal of sports medicine49(11), 749-756.

Cairney, P. (2016). The politics of evidence-based policy making. Springer.

Cairney, P., & Jones, M. D. (2016). K kingdon’s multiple streams approach: what is the empirical impact of this universal theory?. Policy studies journal44(1), 37-58.

Cameron, A., & Shaw, R. (2022, September). Moving Healthcare Professionals Programme: embedding the promotion of physical activity in healthcare curricula. In NET2022 Conference.

Carlin, L., Musson, H., & Adams, E. J. (2019). Moving Healthcare Professionals Programme Phase 1 Clinical Champions’ Physical Activity Training Programme: Final Evaluation Report March 2019.

Carty, C., van der Ploeg, H. P., Biddle, S. J., Bull, F., Willumsen, J., Lee, L., ... & Milton, K. (2021). The first global physical activity and sedentary behaviour guidelines for people living with disability. Journal of Physical Activity and Health18(1), 86-93.

Chau, J., Smith, B. J., Bauman, A., Merom, D., Eyeson‐Annan, M., Chey, T., & Farrell, L. (2008). Recent trends in physical activity in New South Wales. Is the tide of inactivity turning? Australian and New Zealand journal of public health32(1), 82-85.

Coalter, F. (2007). Sports clubs, social capital and social regeneration:‘Ill-defined interventions with hard to follow outcomes’?. Sport in society10(4), 537-559.

Copeland, R. J., Myers, A., Quirk, H., Crank, H., Broom, D., & Goldsmith, S. (2020). Evaluation of the Public Health England and Sport England Funded Physical Activity Clinical Advice Pad Pilot in Primary Care.

Coulter, A., Roberts, S., & Dixon, A. (2013). Delivering better services for people with long-term conditions. Building the house of care. London: The King’s Fund, 1-28.

Crisp, P. (2021). The effectiveness of sport within social intervention projects: a UK case study. Physical Culture and Sport89(1), 55-65.

De Wals, P., Espinoza-Moya, M. E., & Béland, D. (2019). Kingdon’s Multiple Streams Framework and the Analysis of Decision-Making Processes Regarding Publicly-Funded Immunization Programs. Expert Review of Vaccines18(6), 575-585.

Defra. (2008). Outdoors for all? An action plan to increase the number of people from under-represented groups who access the natural environment.

Diez Roux, A. V., & Mair, C. (2010). Neighbourhoods and health. Annals of the New York academy of sciences1186(1), 125-145.

Ding, D., Lawson, K. D., Kolbe-Alexander, T. L., Finkelstein, E. A., Katzmarzyk, P. T., Van Mechelen, W., ... & Lancet Physical Activity Series 2 Executive Committee. (2016). The economic burden of physical inactivity: a global analysis of major non-communicable diseases. The Lancet388(10051), 1311-1324.

Ding, D., Lawson, K. D., Kolbe-Alexander, T. L., Finkelstein, E. A., Katzmarzyk, P. T., Van Mechelen, W., ... & Lancet Physical Activity Series 2 Executive Committee. (2016). The economic burden of physical inactivity: a global analysis of major non-communicable diseases. The Lancet388(10051), 1311-1324.

DiPietro, L., Al-Ansari, S. S., Biddle, S. J., Borodulin, K., Bull, F. C., Buman, M. P., ... & Willumsen, J. F. (2020). Advancing the global physical activity agenda: recommendations for future research by the 2020 WHO physical activity and sedentary behaviour guidelines development group. International Journal of Behavioural Nutrition and Physical Activity17(1), 1-11.

Eime, R. M., Sawyer, N., Harvey, J. T., Casey, M. M., Westerbeek, H., & Payne, W. R. (2015). Integrating public health and sport management: Sport participation trends 2001–2010. Sport management review18(2), 207-217.

Elmose-Østerlund, K., Feiler, S., Breuer, C., Zwahlen, J. A., & Nagel, S. (2022). Characteristics of voluntary sports clubs with targeted initiatives for underrepresented population groups.

Equals, S. (2000). Achieving racial equality: A standard for sport. Sport England: London.

Evans, B., Colls, R., & Hoerschelmann, K. (2011). ‘Change4Life for your kids’: embodied collectives and public health pedagogy. Sport, Education and Society16(3), 323-341.

Ferlay, J., Colombet, M., Soerjomataram, I., Parkin, D. M., Piñeros, M., Znaor, A., & Bray, F. (2021). Cancer statistics for the year 2020: An overview. International journal of cancer149(4), 778-789.

Foad, A., Fullick, S., & Secker, M. (2016). Change4Life Sports Clubs research 2016-part one report.

Galindo, D. (2020). An imagined community in sport: The San Antonio ‘Spurs family’. The International Journal of the History of Sport37(8), 670-691.

Giles-Corti, B., Sallis, J. F., Sugiyama, T., Frank, L. D., Lowe, M., & Owen, N. (2015). Translating active living research into policy and practice: one important pathway to chronic disease prevention. Journal of public health policy36(2), 231-243.

Gov. Uk.  (2015). A New Strategy for Sport (publishing.service.gov.uk)

Gov. Uk. (2012) London 2012 Olympics: Regeneration legacy evaluation framework (publishing.service.gov.uk)

Gov. Uk. (2016). Health matters: getting every adult active every day - GOV.UK (www.gov.uk)

Gov.UK March 2021-Commission on Race and Ethnic Disparities – Commission on Race and Ethnic Disparities: The Report – March 2021 (publishing.service.gov.uk)

Hall, G., Laddu, D. R., Phillips, S. A., Lavie, C. J., & Arena, R. (2021). A tale of two pandemics: How will COVID-19 and global trends in physical inactivity and sedentary behaviour affect one another? Progress in cardiovascular diseases64, 108.

Heath, G. W., Parra, D. C., Sarmiento, O. L., Andersen, L. B., Owen, N., Goenka, S., ... & Lancet Physical Activity Series Working Group. (2012). Evidence-based intervention in physical activity: lessons from around the world. The lancet380(9838), 272-281.

Hellénius, M. L., & Sundberg, C. J. (2011). Physical activity as medicine: time to translate evidence into clinical practice. British Journal of Sports Medicine45(3), 158-158.

Hemmingsson, E. (2018). Early childhood obesity risk factors: socioeconomic adversity, family dysfunction, offspring distress, and junk food self-medication. Current obesity reports7(2), 204-209.

Herweg, N., Zahariadis, N., & Zohlnhöfer, R. (2018). The multiple streams framework: Foundations, refinements, and empirical applications. In Theories of the policy process (pp. 17-53). Routledge.

Herweg, N., Zahariadis, N., & Zohlnhöfer, R. (2018). The multiple streams framework: Foundations, refinements, and empirical applications. In Theories of the policy process (pp. 17-53). Routledge.

Hiam, L., Harrison, D., McKee, M., & Dorling, D. (2018). Why is life expectancy in England and Wales ‘stalling’?. J Epidemiol Community Health72(5), 404-408.

Humphries, R. (2022). A brief history: how we got here. In Ending the Social Care Crisis (pp. 20-52). Policy Press.

Iacobucci, G. (2014). NHS plan calls for new models of care and greater emphasis on prevention.

Inckle, K. (2020). Disability, Cycling and Health: Impacts and (Missed) Opportunities in Public Health. Scandinavian Journal of Disability Research22(1).

Islam, N., Jdanov, D. A., Shkolnikov, V. M., Khunti, K., Kawachi, I., White, M., ... & Lacey, B. (2021). Effects of covid-19 pandemic on life expectancy and premature mortality in 2020: time series analysis in 37 countries. bmj375.

Jayawardhana, A., & Piggin, J. (2021). THE NEED FOR THE DEVELOPMENT OF A UNIQUE FRAMEWORK FOR SPORT POLICY ANALYSIS. Journal of Physical Education & Health10(17), 14-29.

Karlsen, S., & Nazroo, J. Y. (2002). Relation between racial discrimination, social class, and health among ethnic minority groups. American journal of public health92(4), 624-631.

Kiernan, A., & Porter, C. (2014). Little United and the Big Society: negotiating the gaps between football, community and the politics of inclusion. Soccer & Society15(6), 847-863.

Klepac Pogrmilovic, B., O’Sullivan, G., Milton, K., Biddle, S. J., Bauman, A., Bellew, W., ... & Pedisic, Z. (2019). The development of the Comprehensive Analysis of Policy on Physical Activity (CAPPA) framework. International Journal of Behavioural Nutrition and Physical Activity16(1), 1-15.

Kohl 3rd, H. W., Craig, C. L., Lambert, E. V., Inoue, S., Alkandari, J. R., Leetongin, G., ... & Lancet Physical Activity Series Working Group. (2012). The pandemic of physical inactivity: global action for public health. The lancet380(9838), 294-305.

Kokolakakis, T., Lera-López, F., & Ramchandani, G. (2019). Did London 2012 deliver a sports participation legacy? Sport Management Review22(2), 276-287.

Lawrence, A., Carter, C., O’Brien, L., & Lovell, R. (2009). Social benefits from the Forestry Commission Public Forest Estate in England: review of current evidence. The Research Agency of the Forestry Commission.

Lee, I. M., Shiroma, E. J., Lobelo, F., Puska, P., Blair, S. N., Katzmarzyk, P. T., & Lancet Physical Activity Series Working Group. (2012). Effect of physical inactivity on major non-communicable diseases worldwide: an analysis of burden of disease and life expectancy. The lancet380(9838), 219-229.

Leonard, T. C. (2008). Richard H. Thaler, Cass R. Sunstein, Nudge: Improving decisions about health, wealth, and happiness.

Leonard, T.C., Goldfarb, R. S., & Suranovic, S.M. (2000). New on paternalism and Public Policy. Economics and Philosophy16, 323-331.

London Sport. (2016) Social Return On Investment - London Sport

Marmot, M. (2013). Fair society, healthy lives. Fair society, healthy lives, 1-74.

Marmot, M. (2020). Health equity in England: The Marmot review 10 years on. Bmj368.

Martin, S. B., Morrow, J. R., Jackson, A. W., & Dunn, A. L. (2000). Variables related to meeting the CDC/ACSM physical activity guidelines. Medicine and science in sports and exercise32(12), 2087-2092.

Mathers, C. D., & Loncar, D. (2006). Projections of global mortality and burden of disease from 2002 to 2030. PLOS medicine3(11), e442.

Matta, P. N., Baul, T. D., Loubeau, K., Sikov, J., Plasencia, N., Sun, Y., & Spencer, A. E. (2021). Low sports participation is associated with withdrawn and depressed symptoms in urban, school-age children. Journal of affective disorders280, 24-29.

Mattheys, K. (2015). The coalition, austerity and mental health. Disability & Society30(3), 475-478.

Michie, S., Campbell, R., Brown, J., West, R., & Gainforth, H. (2014). ABC of theories of behaviour change. Great Britain: Silverback Publishing.

Minnaert, L. (2012). An Olympic legacy for all? The non-infrastructural outcomes of the Olympic Games for socially excluded groups (Atlanta 1996–Beijing 2008). Tourism Management33(2), 361-370.

Morris, J., & O’Brien, E. (2011). Encouraging healthy outdoor activity amongst under-represented groups: An evaluation of the Active England woodland projects. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening10(4), 323-333.

Morrison, V. (2020). ‘Function First’: How to promote physical activity and physical function in people with long-term conditions managed in primary care? A study combining realist and co-design methods.

Mueller, B. (2020). Why public policies fail: Policymaking under complexity. EconomiA21(2), 311-323.

Mukherjee, I., & Howlett, M. P. (2015). Who is a stream? Epistemic communities, instrument constituencies and advocacy coalitions in multiple streams subsystems. Epistemic Communities, Instrument Constituencies and Advocacy Coalitions in Multiple Streams Subsystems (April 10, 2015). Lee Kuan Yew School of Public Policy Research Paper, (15-18).

Mulderrig, J. (2017). Nudge and the politics of wellbeing: bringing biopower into dialogue with critical discourse analysis. Médiation et Information

Mulderrig, J. (2018). Multimodal strategies of emotional governance: A critical analysis of ‘nudge’tactics in health policy. Critical Discourse Studies15(1), 39-67.

O. Ferdinand, A., Sen, B., Rahurkar, S., Engler, S., & Menachemi, N. (2012). The relationship between built environments and physical activity: a systematic review. American journal of public health102(10), e7-e13.

Phillpots, L. (2013). An analysis of the policy process for physical education and school sport: The rise and demise of school sport partnerships. International journal of sport policy and politics5(2), 193-211.

Piggin, J. (2015). Designed to move? Physical activity lobbying and the politics of productivity. Health education journal74(1), 16-27.

Poulton, E. (2020). Tackling antisemitism within English football: A critical analysis of policies and campaigns using a multiple streams approach. International Journal of Sport Policy and Politics12(1), 25-47.

Poulton, R., Caspi, A., Milne, B. J., Thomson, W. M., Taylor, A., Sears, M. R., & Moffitt, T. E. (2002). Association between children's experience of socioeconomic disadvantage and adult health: a life-course study. The lancet360(9346), 1640-1645.

Pratt, M., Varela, A. R., Salvo, D., Kohl III, H. W., & Ding, D. (2020). Attacking the pandemic of physical inactivity: what is holding us back?. British Journal of Sports Medicine54(13), 760-762.

Public Health England. (2014) Everybody active, every day: framework for physical activity - GOV.UK (www.gov.uk).

Quirk, H., & Haake, S. (2021). Engaging people with long-term health conditions in a community-based physical activity initiative: a qualitative follow-up study evaluating the parkrun PROVE project. BMC Sports Science, Medicine and Rehabilitation13(1), 1-13.

Sierra, I. (2022). PHYSICAL ACTIVITY IN EDUCATION.

Skinner, J., Zakus, D. H., & Cowell, J. (2008). Development through sport: Building social capital in disadvantaged communities. Sport management review11(3), 253-275.

Sparling, P. B., Howard, B. J., Dunstan, D. W., & Owen, N. (2015). Recommendations for physical activity in older adults. Bmj350.

Sport England (2020) https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5EuZfg0OpJE

Sport England. (2014) New £5 million drive to help tackle inactivity | Sport England

Sport England. (2015) This Girl Can | Sport England

Sport England. (2019)Physical activity benefits outweigh risks for people with long-term health conditions | Sport England

Sport England. (2020). Equality and diversity | Sport England

Sport England. (2022) ( https://www.sportengland.org/why-were-here/uniting-the-movement.

Sport England. (2022) How we'll work | Sport England

Strain, T., Milton, K., Dall, P., Standage, M., & Mutrie, N. (2020). How are we measuring physical activity and sedentary behaviour in the four home nations of the UK? A narrative review of current surveillance measures and future directions. British journal of sports medicine54(21), 1269-1276.

Taylor, D. (2014). Physical activity is medicine for older adults. Postgraduate medical journal90(1059), 26-32.

Thornley, A. (2012). The 2012 London Olympics. What legacy?. Journal of Policy Research in Tourism, Leisure and Events4(2), 206-210.

Toop, L., & Richards, D. (2001). Preventing cardiovascular disease in primary care: Targets are fine in principle, but unrealistic. BMJ323(7307), 246-247.

Ukactive. (2022). Ukactive raises concerns with Gogovernment as energy costs double for gyms. Pools and leuisure centres, threatening services and levelling up ambitions.

Vuori, I., Lankenau, B., & Pratt, M. (2004). Physical activity policy and program development: the experience in Finland. Public health reports119(3), 331-345.

Wagner, K. H., & Brath, H. (2012). A global view on the development of non-communicable diseases. Preventive medicine54, S38-S41.

Walker, M., & Hills, S. (2017). Social program evaluations: Strategies and shared value. Sport & Entertainment Review3(3), 65-71.

Websites

Weed, M. (2017). Should we privilege sport for health? The comparative effectiveness of UK government investment in sport as a public health intervention. Sport, Physical Activity and Public Health, 27-44.

Weed, M., Coren, E., Fiore, J., Wellard, I., Mansfield, L., Chatziefstathiou, D., & Dowse, S. (2012). Developing a physical activity legacy from the London 2012 Olympic and Paralympic Games: a policy-led systematic review. Perspectives in public health132(2), 75-80.

Weiler, R., & Stamatakis, E. (2010). Physical activity in the UK: a unique crossroad? British journal of sports medicine44(13), 912-914.

WHO. (2010) WHO launches Global Action Plan on Physical Activity

World Health Organization. (2019). Global Health Estimates: Life expectancy and leading causes of death and disability. World Health Organization.

Previous
Previous

A snap shot of policy making

Next
Next

Obesity lifestyle Change support case study.